Breaking news: companies don't walk their talk
Companies suck sometimes. Take a gander at the latest reader question:
My son works for a large company that diligently avoids written policies and procedures. They say that when they require you to work on a holiday, you can get an alternative day off, but they make it damn difficult to do that. They also make it difficult to take all your vacation days. Therefore, without fail, my son has lost both vacation days and “make up” days for holidays worked. In that he is single, his company often calls upon him to work holidays because he does not have a family to be part of. He DOES NOT receive any additional pay beyond his normal wages when he works a holiday. We live in Colorado. Is there any state of federal law that relates to this behavior?Short answer: nope.
Long answer: it depends.
First, I don't mean to call your son a fibber, but I would be extremely surprised if this large company didn't have an employee handbook that states how holiday & vacation time are handled. He needs to find a copy and look this stuff up. In my experience, companies usually reward employees that work on holidays with time and a half wages. Federal (and Colorado state) law doesn't require special holiday pay or time off (or vacation, for that matter) unless government contracts are involved.
Second, it doesn't matter if a company has written policies and procedures when they set a clear precedent. It doesn't (generally) matter to the courts or, perhaps more importantly, to employees who have to work under their decrees.
For example, if they a) tell everyone if they work a holiday they can have another day off and b) actually follow through with this for everyone EXCEPT your son, they are obviously breaking their own "unwritten rule" and could be held accountable for discrimination for it IF the reason they are doing it (AND he can prove it) are due to your son's disability, race, creed, color, sex, religion, age (40 or over), national origin, ancestry OR, in the great state of Colorado, sexual orientation. Yay for Colorado!
If they are following the "unwritten rule" for everyone except for your son because he's single & doesn't cause a ruckus, well....that's not illegal. It's like Lindsay Lohan's line of leggings: stupid, but not illegal.
So what should Sonny do?
If it were me, I would do two things:
- Put myself in my manager's place and come up with a fair solution.
- Talk to my manager about that solution.
Third, it is neither true nor relevant that single people "do not have a family to be a part of". Your son obviously has a parent that is his family member. I'm single and I have a mom, brother, sister, brother in law, aunt and cousin that I spent Christmas with. Plus I have a bunch of cats - the most important family members of all!
Seriously, even if your son was literally sitting on his couch all day on Christmas, it doesn't matter. Our lives outside of work are none of our employer's business as long as what we do or don't do doesn't harm the company (i.e. drink 2 bottles of champagne before rolling into our forklift driving job). If they try to use that argument with your son, that he's single and therefore doesn't "need" the holiday off, he can rest assured knowing they are not professionals, they don't know WTF they are doing running a business and start looking for a new job ASAP.
Some companies, I tell you, if bullshit were music they would be a brass band.
That's a Dad Quote, by the way.


5 comments:
I wonder if maybe this isn't the son's excuse for not attending family functions? After all, it wasn't him that wrote in with a question. I've used the "I have to work excuse" several times before!
I work for a large company headquartered in CO and that sounds like our policy. Man oh man I hope it's not my company! Perhaps this is fate's way of prodding me to remind everyone in the field what the holiday policy is!
Kimberley - Good point.
Anon - It never ceases to amaze me what some employees believe about company policies. I've had employees ask me if our policy was something draconian and I'm like, um no and it's NEVER been that - where did you even get that?!
Lindsay Lohan has a line of leggings!?!? I must get some.
Or perhaps not. And yeah, there's a policy and furthermore I always think questions are asked by the person it is bothering the most. Therefore, I think Kimberley is onto something.
Hey, just wondering... why are you hearing from the kid's PARENTS?
Presumably, if the son is old enough to work and doesn't have a disability (in which case you probably wouldn't be getting this query, as the discrimination would be obvious), he's old enough to stand up for himself.
He'll likely get treated better once he figures out how to stand on his own two feet... but until he can act like an adult—by which I mean solve his own problems without using the 'rents as intermediaries—why should he expected to be treated like one by his company?
Parents: you're not doing your kids any favors by solving their problems into adulthood.
[Cue catchy-yet-damning Oompa Loompa song... now.]
Post a Comment